Farmers navigate the tricky terrain of profit versus planet

Fertilizer use can harm the environment, but farmers rely on it for increased yield and profits

By Bailey Becker

COLUMBIA, Mo. – As a young boy in the late 1950s, Frank Glenn knew the soft, freshly-tilled brown dirt lining his family’s fields signaled the start of another planting season.

“Back when we were young buckaroos, we would plow and disc and get a crop of weeds to come up [and then] knock them down,” Glenn said.

Frank and his younger brother John would hop on the tractor and start pulling their blue plow through the fields in February and March. Then they would go back with a tiller and turn over the topsoil before planting corn, soybeans, wheat and oats.

Today, the Glenns are still running their family farm in Columbia, growing corn, soybeans and hay. But about 25 years ago they transitioned to a majority no-till operation, no longer digging up the first few inches of soil before planting. Their fields are now filled with big clumps of dirt and old roots from previous harvests. 

No-till farming helps decrease erosion and runoff. It’s one of several regenerative farming methods that help farmers’ fertilizer stay in fields and not run off into nearby waterways.

Rob Myers, director of the University of Missouri Center for Regenerative Agriculture, said less than half of Missouri farmers are using a regenerative method such as cover crops, no-till or integrating crops and livestock. Cost is one of the factors holding farmers back, Myers said. 

Farmers use fertilizer to build their soil’s fertility and help increase crop yields. But less than half of the nitrogen fertilizer applied is taken up by the crops. These excess nutrients wash into the Gulf of Mexico, creating a dead zone where fish and shrimp cannot live.

Farmers are responsible for the cost of implementing alternative practices, and they bear the risk if it doesn’t work. 

“Their first goal is they need to make enough of a profit to stay in business that year,” Myers said.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency calls nutrient pollution “one of America’s most widespread, costly and challenging environmental problems.” But it’s not just an environmental problem – it’s a business one.

Bruce Shryock, a corn, soybean and wheat farmer in Auxvasse, said farmers are stuck between science and the economy. 

“If you spend more and then don’t make any more, then you’re in trouble,” Shryock said.

Farmer finances on the line 

According to a report from the Rural and Farm Finance Policy Analysis Center at the University of Missouri, net farm income in the state is projected to decrease by 14% this year while the U.S. Department of Agriculture anticipates national farm income to fall by a fifth. Meanwhile, farmers’ input costs nationwide have increased by 55% since 2020. 

Fertilizer is one of farmers’ most expensive input costs each year, making up roughly a third of their annually recurring input costs.

Farmers in 2023 are paying nearly 73% more for fertilizer than they did in 2020. 

Farmers continue to buy fertilizer because it offers a good return on investment, said Ray Massey, markets and policy professor at MU’s College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. The cost of fertilizer is still less than the amount farmers are going to make from selling their crops.

“The economics said that you can make more money if you have higher yields,” Massey said. 

Phillip Willer, store manager of MFA Agri Services Columbia/Cedar Creek, said no one in the industry was prepared for fertilizer’s drastic price surge in 2022. Willer said the price of anhydrous fertilizer was anywhere between $300-$500 for a ton. 

Now it’s about $900, he said.

Farmers also must factor in other input costs like seed, pesticide, equipment and fuel. Crop revenue has increased but the prices for inputs have continued to rise, so their margins have stayed about the same, Frank Glenn said. 

 “It seems like they (the ag industry) don’t want farmers to make any money, ” he said.

Some farmers coped with the price increases by cutting back on the amount of fertilizer they apply. Frank Glenn said he and his brother went from applying 180 pounds an acre to 120 pounds last year. He said they were lucky crop prices were high or they might have not been able to survive the fertilizer price hike. 

 “Jesus, it makes you wanna puke,” his brother John Glenn said. “It’s so expensive.“

Promoting intentional fertilizer use

Because fertilizer is expensive, farmers want to get the most bang for their buck, said Andrea Rice, director of research, education, and outreach at the Missouri Fertilizer Control Board. 

The Board enforces Missouri fertilizer laws, conducts nutrient research and helps farms implement alternative farming methods. 

Rice said high costs and current profit margins discourage farmers from applying more than the recommended amount. She pointed out that farmers are losing money if the fertilizer washes off their fields. 

Heavy rain or snow melt washes fertilizer into waterways. Those nutrients can pollute water and create toxic algae blooms in lakes and rivers. Ultimately, some of this pollution travels downstream to the Gulf of Mexico and creates a hypoxic area called the dead zone at the mouth of the Mississippi River where water oxygen levels plummet. Any wildlife in these areas must move or suffocate.

“The Gulf hypoxia situation – that’s not something that any farmer would want to cause,” Rice said. 

Rice said farmers understand there are people who fish the Gulf and depend on it to support their families. Gulf hypoxia did not appear overnight, she said, and it’s going to take time to find a solution. 

“The American farmer wants a seat at the table,” Rice said, to help solve pollution problems downstream.

Farmers have several ways of measuring how much fertilizer they need to apply to their fields. This includes soil testing and looking at past harvests to compare their yield to the amount of fertilizer they applied. 

The Glenns use a satellite to create a grid of their fields and take samples from each block on the grid. They can see how their soil structure varies and pinpoint the exact nutrients each block needs.

Miscalculations such as applying too much fertilizer, applying it on frozen ground or overwatering fields will increase the runoff potential. 

Rice said some farmers will not do everything perfectly, but the majority of people in the industry want to do it right.

Sarah Carden, a senior policy advocate at Farm Action, an advocacy group opposing corporate influence in agriculture, said the industry is set up to support conventional farming, which disincentivizes alternative practices. 

It’s easier for conventional farmers to qualify for crop insurance, Carden said, but it gets harder when a farmer wants to decrease the amount of fertilizer they use.

“It becomes a lot riskier for a farmer to participate in alternative forms of production,” Carden said. 

Making change happen

One alternative farming method farmers can adopt to minimize the harmful effects of fertilizer is to plant cover crops, which help decrease erosion, hold moisture in the ground and reduce weeds. 

Integrating cover crops was a learning experience for Shryock, the farmer from Auxvasse. In his first year planting cover crops, a wet spring spurred his rye to grow to about 8 feet tall. Getting that tall rye out of the field was a challenge, as it wrapped around his planter shaft and damaged the bearings on his equipment.

“I cussed it that first year,” he said. 

Shryock has since learned to kill rye when it’s about 2 feet tall. He saw the benefits of cover crops after that first year as it helped his soil and decreased runoff. 

Shryock also no-tills in addition to cover crops. These practices take more time, he said, but they’ve been worth it. He cut back on the amount of fuel he uses, but he still has to buy seed, pesticide and must spend time planting the cover crop. Shryock thinks more people would plant them if there was an incentive to help cover their costs. 

Rice said teaching farmers about these practices can be as challenging as trying to “teach a kindergartener calculus,” but education can help increase the adoption of cover crops.

Rice said some farmers are used to doing things the way they always have – the way that they were taught by parents or grandparents. Change can be hard, especially if they are farming alongside their older relatives.  

Rice first advises new clients to do soil sampling. Then, she discusses the type of fertilizer they are using, the amount, application times and if they are using cover crops. 

“If we take those things and we do a little bit at a time and we keep encouraging and keep educating over time, there will be a big impact,” Rice said.

The MU Center for Regenerative Agriculture has recently been awarded two grants: $25 million to offer financial incentives for farmers to implement regenerative practices and $10 million to research how to improve varieties of cover crops. 

The grant will pay farmers to adopt grid sampling, cover crops and livestock grazing systems to decrease nitrogen runoff. It also will fund programs to help farmers learn about these methods and their benefits.

“It takes time to keep making changes and improvements in agriculture,” Myers said. “But I think we’re headed in the right direction with these practices.” 

This story is part of The Price of Plenty, a special project investigating fertilizer from the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications and the University of Missouri School of Journalism, supported by the Pulitzer Center’s nationwide Connected Coastlines reporting initiative.

Read Next: How the fertilizer industry funds research in Florida